RiskAtlas methods
Structured source registers, provenance, jurisdiction, currency and applicability used to organise Australian policy, employment, social-support, health and regulatory research.
Australia · What we build
Research systems and public-interest products for Australian contexts.
Sentrix Digital Australia combines consulting with a developing product and research layer. The emphasis is on authoritative sources, clear jurisdiction boundaries, transparent evidence and tools that make complex systems easier to understand and use.
Australian work
Focused tools rather than a single flagship product.
ClinicalAtlas AU
Australian conditions, medicines, clinicians and health-system context, with source boundaries kept separate from the South African layer.
Explore ClinicalAtlas AU → Social support · LiveSocial Security Compass AU
Government payments, eligibility, processes and support pathways organised in practical language with authoritative source links.
Open Compass AU → Public-interest projectNarcolepsy Navigator
A focused Australian navigation project for people investigating, living with or supporting someone with narcolepsy. It remains one project within the wider portfolio.
View project → Research systemsEvidence architecture
Research workflows, source governance and structured knowledge systems developed through Sentrix consulting and independent research work.
See consulting capability → CapabilityTraining & knowledge tools
Workshops, explainers and structured learning designed to make complex institutional material more usable for real audiences.
Explore training →How we build
Australian context is a design constraint, not a label.
Primary sources first
Government, legislation, regulators and other authoritative Australian sources come before commentary.
Rules in context
Jurisdiction, date, audience, status and applicability stay visible instead of being flattened into generic guidance.
Translate without hiding uncertainty
Research is structured so people can understand what is known, what is uncertain and what the next practical step is.
Design principle: technology should increase human agency rather than replace human judgement.
Services
Sentrix Consulting is the applied services practice.
Consulting, policy and regulatory research, governance, systems analysis, evidence architecture, stakeholder work and capability building sit alongside the product and research layer.
South African counterpart
A broader product ecosystem built around connected institutional knowledge.
Sentrix Digital South Africa is the more product-dense side of the practice. It brings together reference intelligence, health-system information, medical-scheme context, social-support navigation and claims coordination. The products remain jurisdiction-specific, but they share the same underlying discipline: authoritative sources, visible provenance, structured evidence and information designed for real use.
Reference intelligence
RiskAtlas
The research and intelligence layer connecting policy, occupational, clinical, regulatory and social-support material with explicit source provenance.
Explore RiskAtlas → Claims coordinationClaimHub
A shared claim environment designed to connect evidence, requests, timelines, permissions and authorised participants around one case.
Explore ClaimHub → Claimant experienceClaimBuddy
The claimant-facing side of the claims environment: organise evidence, understand process, identify gaps and remain visible in the shared record.
Explore ClaimBuddy → Clinical referenceClinicalAtlas ZA
South African conditions, medicines, therapies, clinicians and health-system context organised as a reusable reference layer.
Explore ClinicalAtlas → Medical schemesSchemeBook
Medical-scheme directory, benefit context and terminology grounded in official South African sources and consumer-facing explanations.
Explore SchemeBook → Social supportSocial Security Compass ZA
Grants, benefits, eligibility, processes and support pathways structured into practical navigation for people using the social-support system.
Explore Compass ZA →
Why keep the markets separate? The research architecture can be shared, but law, regulators, health systems, social-security programmes, terminology and institutional pathways are not interchangeable. Comparative learning is useful; jurisdiction-specific evidence remains authoritative.